USPTO serial 75628134
CLEARLY SUPERIOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2002
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEARLY SUPERIOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Hirsch, Esq.
MICHAEL J HIRSCH MOSS & BARNETT4800 WELLS FARGO CER90 S 7TH ST STE 4800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | wireless telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice and data by electronic means | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |