Drawing for PORTFOLIO UPDATE

USPTO serial 75628232

PORTFOLIO UPDATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PORTFOLIO UPDATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence M. Jarvis

LAWRENCE M JARVIS MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON ST34TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION ON SECURITIES, RESEARCH AND SURVEILLANCE ON SECURITIES VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 26, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 18, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 18, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 17, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 10, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 22, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 5, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance