USPTO serial 75628342
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS A. BROWNE
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION12072-0300 ANGELA ISABELL15000 CAPITAL ONE DRRICHMOND, VA 23238| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, consumer and commercial banking, processing, funding, underwriting, and administering annuities; financial card, debit card and credit card services, namely, processing, underwriting, issuing, servicing, and administering credit cards, chip cards, debit cards, corporate cards, and secured cards; electronic funds transfer provided through automated teller machines; investment consultation, namely, financial and investment planning and consulting; consumer and commercial leasing financing; real estate financing, namely, mortgage lending, home equity loans, and commercial equity financing | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |