USPTO serial 75628381
DISPLAY WIZARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2001
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DISPLAY WIZARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CRAIG A. GROSSMAN
CRAIG A GROSSMAN IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAM WHICH MEASURES THE DISPLAY AND VIDEO CARD OF A PERSONAL COMPUTER FOR USE IN VIDEO AND COMPUTER CALIBRATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 14, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |