USPTO serial 75628604
PROTECHNICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 2002
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROTECHNICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Core Laboratories, Global N.V.
Willemstad, Curacao, AN
Core Laboratories, Global N.V.
Willemstad, Curacao, AN
Core Laboratories, Global N.V.
Willemstad, Curacao, AN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene L. Tyler
Gene L. Tyler Mossman Kumar & Tyler PCP.O. Box 421239Houston, TX 77242UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Engineering and consulting services in the fields of fracture diagnostics; telemetry of borehole data, namely, telemetry of data from drill stem testing, stimulation procedures, drilling, directional drilling, underbalanced drilling, well testing and production logging; spectral imaging; gas storage monitoring; oil and gas well imaging analysis; and analysis of oil and gas fields, namely, gravel pack evaluation, production buildup of field floods, acidizing evaluation, cement tracer analysis, stimulation tracer analysis, and collar marks analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Laboratories, Global N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Laboratories, Global N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Laboratories, Global N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROTECHNICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |