Drawing for RHYTHM & BLUES CAFE

USPTO serial 75628678

RHYTHM & BLUES CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHYTHM & BLUES CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERNTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016mounted photographs and unmounted photographs and postersACTIVE—
042restaurant, cafe, and nightclub servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 30, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 15, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 13, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 9, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance