USPTO serial 75628686
ALTER.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALTER.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER, EHRMAN, WHITE & MCAULIFFE525 UNIVERSITY AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Computerized communication services, namely, providing computerized networks for the purpose of transmission and reception of electronic mail, news and other data and information; facsimile services provided over global computer communications networks; and broadcasting a wide variety of programs, meetings, events and real time information over global computer communications networks | ACTIVE | Nov 24, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |