USPTO serial 75628761
HOLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAYAT,BRADLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald S. Holland
DONALD S HOLLAND171 DWIGHT RDLONGMEADOW, MA 01106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINE OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY-CUTTING TOOLS, SPECIFICALLY TWIST DRILLS, CENTER DRILLS, STEP DRILLS, HOLD CUTTERS, SOLID CARBIDE DRILLS, STONE DRILLS, TAPS, DIE, SETS OF DIES AND TAPS, HOLDERS, COUNTERSINKS, COUNTERBORES, REAMERS, CIRCULARSAW BLADES, SHELL ENDMILLS, ROUGHING ENDMILLS AND ENDMILLS WITH SHANK; CUTTING/MILLING TOOLS, SPECIFICALLY HIGH SPEED CUTTERS, MILLING CUTTERS, CUTTER HEADS, INSERTS, TURNING TOOLS, TURNING TOOLS WITH SOLID CARBIDE INSERTS, TURNING TOOLS WITH INSERTS, THREADING TOOLS AND BROACHES; CLAMPING TOOLS, SPECIFICALLY LATHE CHUCKS, DRIVING CENTERS AND ACCESSORIES, TAPPING ATTACHMENTS, DRILL CHUCKS, ADAPTOR ARBORS, ADAPTORS, MILLING CHUCKS, EDGE FINDERS/INDICATORS, TOOL PRESETTERS, MACHINE VISES, CLAMPING ACCESSORIES, PARALLELS, ARBORS AND MAGNETIC CHUCKS; FILING/GRINDING/SAWING TOOLS, SPECIFICALLY HIGH SPEED STEEL ENGRAVING TOOLS, MILLING PINS, GRINDING PINS, ABRASIVE PAPER, ABRASIVE DISCS, CUTTING DISCS, SAW BLADES AND SAWS; HAND TOOLS, SPECIFICALLY TORQUE GAGES, SCREW DRIVERS, BITS AND TOOL HOLDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | HAND OPERATED TOOLS NAMELY - CUTTING TOOLS, SPECIFICALLY MACHINE VISES, CLAMPING ACCESSORIES, PARALLELS, ARBORS AND MAGNETIC CHUCKS, FILING/GRINDING/SAWING TOOLS, SPECIFICALLY FILES, PRECISION FILES, SPECIAL FILES, WOOD RASPES, HIGH SPEED STEEL ENGRAVING TOOLS, MILLINGPINS, GRINDING PINS, ABRASIVE PAPER, ABRASIVE DISCS, CUTTING DISCS, BRUSHES FOR TECHNICAL USE, SAW BLADES AND SAWS; HAND TOOLS, SPECIFICALLY WRENCHES, HEXAGON WRENCHES, SPECIAL WRENCHES, TORQUE SETS, SOCKETS AND RATCHES, TORQUE GAGES, SCREW DRIVERS, BITS, TOOL HOLDERS, PLIERS, SIDE CUTTERS, WIRE STRIPPERS, ELECTRICIAN PLIERS, BOLT AND CABLE CUTTERS CHISELS, HAMMERS, SCISSORS, RIVETING PLIERS, FORGING TOOLS, WOODWORKING TOOLS, PIPE THREAD CUTTERS AND PLIERS, WATER INSTALLATION TOOLS, STAMPING TOOLS, ELECTRICIAN KNIVES, OIL CANS, LETTER PUNCHES, ADJUSTABLE CLAMPS, VICES, PULLERS AND BENDING TOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |