USPTO serial 75628804
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Salt Lake City, UT
North Salt Lake City, UT
North Salt Lake City, UT
North Salt Lake City, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James G. Swensen, Jr.
James G. Swensen, Jr. SWENSEN & ANDERSEN PLLC299 S MAIN ST STE 1300SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Tooth whitening gel and bleaching kits consisting of tooth whitening gel, a mouth piece, and a gel applicator all sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |