USPTO serial 75629021
IDEA.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDEA.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS C SAITTA
THOMAS C SAITTA LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C SAITTA1301 RIVERPLACE BLVD STE 1500JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment staffing services in the field of information technology | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 20, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |