Drawing for INRICH

USPTO serial 75629482

INRICH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INRICH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith M. Stolte

KEITH M STOLTE BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemicals and chemical preparations for use in the further manufacture of personal care products and cosmetics, household products, polymer products, pharmaceuticals, food and beverages, automotive, home furnishings, apparel, recreational equipment, industrial coatings, graphic arts, microelectronics, paper coatings, adhesives, water treatment applications, tires, petroleum products, reaction injection molded plastics, and molded plastics; chemical polymer, and unprocessed plastics and polyurethanes for use in the further manufacture of products in the fields of apparel, medical, communications, geophysical, audiovisual, military, recreational, industrial, plumbing, industrial piping,, fire sprinklers, construction, electronics, automotive, footwear, industrial equipment, and aerospace; plastic coatings for de-icing and erosion protection for transportation vehicles surfacesACTIVE—
006gasketing, sealing and packing materials, and gaskets, seals and packing, made of metal, all for use in retaining and sealing fluids in pipelines and fluid handling machineryACTIVE—
017plastics, polyurethanes and polymers for use in the fields of apparel, medical, communications, geophysical, audiovisual, military recreational, industrial, plumbing, industrial piping, fire sprinklers, construction, electronics, automotive, footwear, industrial equipment, and aerospace; plastic coatings for de-icing and erosion protection for transportation vehicle surfaces; fluid sealing products; gasketing, sealing and packing materials, and gaskets, seals and packings; pre-formed gaskets, packings and seals, all for use in retaining and sealing fluids in pipelines and fluid handling machinery; synthetic and natural rubber, gutta-percha, caoutchouc, and products made therefromACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance