USPTO serial 75629629
ADVANCE FOR PROVIDERS OF POST ACUTE CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANCE FOR PROVIDERS OF POST ACUTE CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLPONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MAGAZINE FEATURING THE ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONS | ACTIVE | Jun 25, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |