Drawing for Z-TEL DIRECT

USPTO serial 75629656

Z-TEL DIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Z-TEL DIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janice W. Housey

JANICE W HOUSEY ROBERTS MLOTKOWSKI & HOBBESPO BOX 10064MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing local and long distance telephone services; providing electronic voice, voice mail, facsimile and data transmission, and electronic mail; providing telephonic routing services, namely activating call forwarding from telephone to telephone; providing communication connections for the transmission of voice, electronic mail and data by linking users via facsimiles and telephones and a global computer network; providing electronic data interchange servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 25, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 3, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance