USPTO serial 75629663
RAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK H. TIDMAN
MARK H TIDMAN PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE LLP1200 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2412UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER RENTAL; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN; LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; COMPUTER LEASING; PHOTOGRAPHIC REPORTING; NEWS REPORTERS SERVICES; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE IN VIDEO RECORDING, RETRIEVAL AND TRANSMISSION; LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; VIDEOTAPING; NEWS AGENCIES; NAMELY GATHERING AND DISSEMINATION OF NEWS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |