USPTO serial 75629684
OMACHRON TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2001
- Examiner
- REDDICK, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with OMACHRON TECHNOLOGIES INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Katonah, NY
Katonah, NY
Hampton, Ontario, CA
NASSAU, BS
OMACHRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INC.
HAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by OMACHRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell J. Weinstein
Mitchell J. Weinstein Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC2 N. LaSalle StreetSuite 1300Chicago, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | industrial and commercial development of products and processes for others | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Omachron Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Omachron Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Omachron Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by G.B.D. CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by OMACHRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OMACHRON TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2024 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2021 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2007 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |