USPTO serial 75629750
ECONEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAUTERBACH, JODI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECONEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew B Katz
ANDREW B KATZ COHENMOBR, LLP1055 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST N WSTE 504WASHINGTON, DC 20007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PREPARING, PLACING AND DISSEMINATING ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC BANKING SERVICES, ELECTRONIC BILL PAYMENT, ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER, ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT ACTIVITY TRACKING, ELECTRONIC CHECK BOOK BALANCING, AND ELECTRONIC DIGITAL VERIFICATION OF SUCH BANKING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE, NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING AND MANAGING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |