USPTO serial 75630204
CHANNELNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2003
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHANNELNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GEORGE TOMPKINS INVESTMENTS, INC.
MILL VALLEY, CA, US
MILL VALLEY, CA, US
EAST LANSING, MI, US
MILL VALLEY, CA, US
Mill Valley, CA, US
MILL VALLEY, CA, US
DEARBORN, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Forte
Steven M. Forte Honigman LLP39400 Woodward Ave, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTERACTIVE SALES SOFTWARE FOR CREATING A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK SELLING ENVIRONMENT THAT ENABLES CUSTOMERS TO INTERACTIVELY CONFIGURE, PRICE AND MAKE PURCHASING DECISIONS, ALLOWING CUSTOMERS TO VIEW CORPORATE-ENDORSED SALES, REBATES INCENTIVES, OFFERS, AND PROMOTIONS ENABLING ONLINE PURCHASE FINANCING, LOCATING AND INTERACTING WITH CHANNEL PARTNERS, SELF-SERVICE WEB SITE DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT UTILITIES THAT ALLOW CHANNEL PARTNERS TO BUILD CORPORATE-APROVED WEB SITES, CREATING AND MANAGING ON-LINE LEAD GENERATION FOR CHANNEL PARTNERS, CREATING ON-LINE PRODUCT CATALOGUES, AND CREATING E-COMMERCE TRANSACTION ENGINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 1999 |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION INCLUDING EVALUATIONS OF A CUSTOMER'S EXISTING SALES AND MARKETING INFRASTRUCTURE; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO BRAND VALUE AND BRAND POSITIONING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 1999 |
| 041 | COMPUTER TRAINING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 1999 |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION REGARDING THE PROPER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND WEB SERVER CONFIGURATION, LINKING AND INTEGRATION NEEDED FOR ELECTRONIC COMMERCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGE TOMPKINS INVESTMENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTAD GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by RESEDA GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTAD GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by SoftAd Group. Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by SoftAd Group. Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by THE SOFTAD GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHANNELNET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |