Drawing for Serial No. 75630275

USPTO serial 75630275

Serial No. 75630275

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2770527Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 7, 2003
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with Serial No. 75630275?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele M. Glessner

Michele M. Glessner MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC100 NORTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025HOSIERYSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2024CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 7, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 6, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 16, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Apr 16, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Apr 14, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 201489AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Mar 31, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 23, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 4, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 22, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 21, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 1, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 17, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 6, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 30, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 5, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 31, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 14, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 1999MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance