USPTO serial 75630377
N NEXICOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with N NEXICOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M6S 4J5, CA
Toronto, Ontario M6S 4J5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W McKee
JAMES W MCKEE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE 7TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephone supplies and equipment, namely, telephone cords, fiber optic cable, installation hardware, modems, multiplexers, modular hardware, voicemail systems, terminal blocks, wire and cable, telephone systems, comprised of some or all of, telephone answering machines, telephone cords, fiber optic cable, caller ID terminals, telephones, facsimile machines, headsets, installation hardware, modems, multiplexers, modular hardware, voicemail systems, signaling devices, namely, repeaters, doublers, and copper and fiber optic transmission equipment, terminal blocks, wire and cable, and test equipment for use in testing phone line integrity | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |