Drawing for NORTH AMERICAN STEEL FRAMING ALLIANCE

USPTO serial 75630443

NORTH AMERICAN STEEL FRAMING ALLIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORTH AMERICAN STEEL FRAMING ALLIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B. HARRISON

MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042ASSOCIATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROMOTING THE INTERESTS OF STEEL MANUFACTURERS; PROMOTING THE USE OF STEEL FRAMING IN RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF STEEL MANUFACTURERS, THROUGH THE DISSEMINATION OF PROMOTIONAL MATERIALSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance