USPTO serial 75630745
THE NAME SAYS IT ALL.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE NAME SAYS IT ALL.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah B, Crenshaw
DEBORAH B CRENSHAW THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201-4656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Computerized Communications for Employer and Employee Services, Namely, World Wide Web Access Services, Hosting Web-Site Services, Hosting On- Line Chat Room and Bulletin Board Services, Intranet Networking Services and Database Services | ACTIVE | Jun 24, 1997 |
| 042 | Providing By Means of A Global Computer Network, Employment and Employer Related Services, Namely, Employer and Employment Recruiting Opportunities, Career Planning Information Services, Informational Services On Employment Education and Training Programs and Opportunities, Computer On-Line Resumes and Resume Services, Job Fair Informational Services | ACTIVE | Jun 24, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |