USPTO serial 75630858
A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COTTON, AMY PAGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in creating, managing, disseminating, viewing and interacting with online text, graphics and multimedia documents and printed instructional manuals sold together as a unit; computer programs, namely, application programs for managing and automating business-to-business communications and transactions through local and global communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |