USPTO serial 75630897
TRIAD HOSPITALS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIAD HOSPITALS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TRIAD HOSPITALS HOLDINGS, INC.
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
Nashville, TN
HEALTHTRUST, INC.- THE HOSPITAL COMPANY
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by HEALTHTRUST, INC.- THE HOSPITAL COMPANY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOT A. DUVALL
SCOT A DUVALL MIDDLETON & REUTLINGER2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TWRLOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | healthcare and medical services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRIAD HOSPITALS HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRIAD HOSPITALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by C/HCA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HEALTHTRUST, INC.- THE HOSPITAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRIAD HOSPITALS, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |