Drawing for ERTECH

USPTO serial 75631174

ERTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2354924Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 6, 2000
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ERTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle T. Peterson

Kyle T. Peterson PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN, P.A.4800 IDS CENTER80th South 8th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002INDUSTRIAL UNDERCOATINGS SOLD IN BULK, NAMELY, NON-FIBERED ASPHALT EMULSIONS AND ASPHALT BASED GELS FOR USE ON VEHICLE UNDERBODIES AND AS A MOISTURE BARRIER OVER METAL PARTSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 14, 1998
017WAX-BASED EMULSIONS FOR USE IN GYPSUM/STUCCO FORMULATIONS, AS A WOOD FIBERS RESIN DILUENT AND AS AN EDGE SEALER FOR SAW MILL PRODUCTSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 14, 1998
019INDUSTRIAL UNDERCOATINGS SOLD IN BULK, NAMELY, NON-FIBERED ASPHALT-BASED GELS FOR USE AS A MOISTURE BARRIER OVER BUILDING STRUCTURES AND CONCRETE SURFACESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 14, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2011CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 5, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2006C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 28, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 6, 2006815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 6, 2006E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 6, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 14, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance