USPTO serial 75631347
REDPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2851074Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2004
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REDPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
83071 Stephanskirchen, DE
83071 Stephanskirchen, DE
83071 Stephanskirchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren A. Sklar
WARREN A SKLAR RENNER OTTO BOISSELLE & SKLAR1621 EUCLID AVE 19TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books for teaching and learning language; learning aids, namely, printed and unprinted labels, label holders, and paper tags; printed instructional materials for learning and teaching language, all sold as a kit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |