USPTO serial 75631796
ARENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD W GOODMAN
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORP580 WHITE PLAINS RDTARRYTOWN, NY 10591-5190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, ATHLETIC BAGS, ATTACHE CASES, BACKPACKS, BILLFOLDS, BOOK BAGS, BRIEFCASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, CARRY-ON BAGS, DUFFEL BAGS, FANNY PACKS, KNAPSACKS, LUGGAGE, LUGGAGE TAGS, OVERNIGHT BAGS, POCKETBOOKS, BRIEFCASE TYPE PORTFOLIOS, PURSES, SCHOOL BAGS, TOTE BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 30, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |