USPTO serial 75631802
POWERBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWERBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TAWNYA R. WOJCIECHOWSKI
TAWNYA R WOJCIECHOWSKI SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON650 TOWN CTR DR 4TH FLCOSTA MESA, CA 92626-1993UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | golf equipment, namely golf clubs and golf clubheads | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |