USPTO serial 75631870
MICHAUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2000
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICHAUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MANUAL R. VALCARCEL
Manuel Valcarcel Greenberg Traurig, P.A.Suite 4400333 Avenue of the AmericasMiami, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, foundation primer, oil control matifying gel, exfoliating enzyme scrub, brush wash, foaming make-up remover, lip lacquers, lip glosses, lip pencils, lip primers, lip exfoliating treatment, lipsticks, eye shadows, cream shadows, foundations, mascaras, eyeliners, powderliners, colorlift, luminizer palettes, liquid liner, brow powders, brow tints, brow set, shimmer dust powders, luminizers, lift and firm creams, loose powders, shadow primers, concealers, bronzers and blush-on blushes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |