USPTO serial 75631944
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Waterloo, Ontario N2J 3H8, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIDNEY WYNTON SEMPLE
130 BLOOR ST STE 601TORONTO, ON M5S 1N5CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for storing, searching, retrieving, formatting, analyzing and displaying data in a spatially referenced context; spatial database computer software; data conversion computer software; software programming tools for conversion of data to a format suitable for spatial display as configured by the user and for use in developing software applications in the field of water quality, cultural landscape, genealogy, eco-system monitoring, community economic development, real estate agency, mortgage lending, municipal assessment, and land use; and books, technical manuals, instructional and teaching materials, manuals and brochures sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |