Drawing for INTELLIGENT WATERS

USPTO serial 75631988

INTELLIGENT WATERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIGENT WATERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherri L. Rohlf

SHERRI L ROHLF SIEGEL BRILL GREUPNERFOSTER PA100 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2191

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplementsACTIVE—
032beverages, namely water containing herbal and dietary supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 14, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 8, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 14, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance