Drawing for WORLD FEDERATION OF PAYROLL MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 75632118

WORLD FEDERATION OF PAYROLL MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLD FEDERATION OF PAYROLL MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Hazard, Jr.

JOHN W HAZARD JR WEBSTER, CHAMBERLAIN & BEAN1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Promoting the interests of the payroll profession in the United States and abroadACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 10, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 12, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance