USPTO serial 75632525
GO-KEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2615661Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 3, 2002
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GO-KEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINDEN, NV
Livermore, CA
Livermore, CA
Livermore, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Coded microchips for use in recreation vehicle access systems which provide safety warnings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 1999 |
| 012 | Recreational vehicle access devices comprising a code microchip containing safety warnings, an access key for activating said warnings, a keyhole, a battery, electrical components and switches joining said access key, keyhole, battery, and coded microchip, and a mini-speaker for audibly broadcasting said warnings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PATMONT MOTOR WERKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Patmont Motor Werks
- Other trademarks owned by Patmont Motor Werks
- Other trademarks owned by Patmont Motor Werks
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named GO-KEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |