USPTO serial 75632614
TAMATO'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAMATO'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALFRED C FRAWLEY
ALFRED C FRAWLEY PRETI, FLAHERTY, BELIVEAU & PACHIOS LLCP O BOX 9546PORTLAND, ME 04112-9546UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services, namely, operation of retail restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |