Drawing for SUN DRILLING PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 75632771

SUN DRILLING PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUN DRILLING PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAN M DE LA ROSA

DAN M DE LA ROSA DREIER & BARITZ LLP499 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004OIL AND GAS DRILLING FLUID ADDITIVES, LUBRICANTS AND SOLID FRICTION REDUCING PARTICLES USED IN THE OIL AND GAS WELL DRILLING INDUSTRYACTIVEMay 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 28, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance