USPTO serial 75632873
MODELOESPECIAL.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODELOESPECIAL.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. YAMMY
JOSEPH A YANNY YANNY & SMITH1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 1260LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2713UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ONLINE RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING BEER AND BEER RELATED MERCHANDISE, NAMELY, COOLERS, UMBRELLAS, PICNIC EQUIPMENT, BOTTLE COOLER WRAPS, ICE BUCKETS, SERVING TRAYS, AND CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, CAPS AND BOXER SHORTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ONLINE SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ONLINE DATABASES, FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF BEER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MODELOESPECIAL.COM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |