Drawing for NEGRAMODELO.COM

USPTO serial 75632874

NEGRAMODELO.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEGRAMODELO.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH A. YANNY

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail services featuring beer and beer related merchandise, namely, coolers, umbrellas, picnic equipment, bottle cooler wraps, ice buckets, serving trays, and clothing, namely T-shirts, caps and boxer shortsACTIVE—
042Online services, namely providing online database, featuring information in the field of beerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 10, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 5, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance