USPTO serial 75632945
CORONAEXTRA.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORONAEXTRA.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
11320 Mexico, D.F., MX
Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
11320 Mexico, D.F., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Grieco
MARY L GRIECO YANNY, GRIECO & MCFARLAND1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 1260LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ONLINE RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING BEER AND BEER RELATED MERCHANDISE, NAMELY, COOLERS, UMBRELLAS, PICNIC EQUIPMENT, BOTTLE COOLER WRAPS, ICE BUCKETS, SERVING TRAYS, AND CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, CAPS AND BOXER SHORTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ONLINE SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ONLINE DATABASES, FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF BEER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CORONAEXTRA.NET
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |