USPTO serial 75632976
ABSOLUTE FILMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABSOLUTE FILMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E Malm
MARCUS L MORTON, MANAGING PTR ABSOLUTE ENTERTAINMENT LLC11300 W OLYMPIC BLVD STE 610LOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | MOTION PICTURE FILM PRODUCTION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |