USPTO serial 75633215
MONSTER GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONSTER GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George H. Spencer
ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lawrence, John F.
- Other trademarks owned by Lawrence, John F.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MONSTER GUARD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |