USPTO serial 75633418
Serial No. 75633418
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2610788Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2002
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75633418?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
74370 METZ-TESSY, FR
74370 METZ-TESSY, FR
METZ-TESSY, FR
74370 Metz-Tessy, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. BAXLEY
Charles E. Baxley Hart, Baxley, Daniels & Holton90 John Street - Suite 403New York, NY 10038-3242UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shoes and boots | EXPIRED | Aug 10, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |