USPTO serial 75633438
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mystic Coast & Country Travel & Leisure Council, Inc.
North Stonington, CT
Other trademarks owned by Mystic Coast & Country Travel & Leisure Council, Inc.
Mystic Coast & Country Travel & Leisure Council, Inc.
North Stonington, CT
Other trademarks owned by Mystic Coast & Country Travel & Leisure Council, Inc.
Mystic Coast & Country Travel & Leisure Council, Inc.
North Stonington, CT
Other trademarks owned by Mystic Coast & Country Travel & Leisure Council, Inc.
Southeastern Connecticut Tourism District
New London, CT
Other trademarks owned by Southeastern Connecticut Tourism District
Southeastern Connecticut Tourism District
New London, CT
Other trademarks owned by Southeastern Connecticut Tourism District
Southeastern Connecticut Tourism District
New London, CT
Other trademarks owned by Southeastern Connecticut Tourism District
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Begler
JAY H. BEGLER Nixon Peabody LLP401 Ninth Street, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting tourism in the Mystic, Connecticut area | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 28, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |