USPTO serial 75633509
PETIT MUSTIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PETIT MUSTIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter K. Sommer
PETER K SOMMER PHILLIPS LYTLE HITCHCOCKBLAINE & HUBER LLP3400 MARINE MIDLAND CTRBUFFALO, NY 14203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, JERSEYS, SHIRTS, SHORTS, PANTS, WRAPS, TOPS, TIES, SHIFTS, T-SHIRTS, BATHING SUITS, BATHING TRUNKS, AND TENNIS WEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |