USPTO serial 75633541
SILENT VAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILENT VAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jiri M. Mestecky
NANETTE M NORTON BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER TOOLS; NAMELY, CORDED AND CORDLESS CIRCULAR SAWS, RECIPROCATING SAWS, JIG SAWS, BELT SANDERS, PAD SANDERS, RANDOM ORBITAL SANDERS, PLANERS, ROUTERS AND PLATE JOINTERS; POWER-OPERATED BENCHTOP TOOLS; NAMELY, BELT SANDERS, DISC SANDERS, OSCILLATING BELT SANDERS, OSCILLATING SPINDLE SANDERS, BAND SAWS, TABLE SAWS, RADIAL ARM SAWS, MITER SAWS, CHOP SAWS, DRILL PRESSES, GRINDERS, ROUTER TABLES, LATHES, THICKNESS PLANERS AND JOINTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ryobi North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ryobi North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SILENT VAC
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |