USPTO serial 75633588
IRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
77183 Marne La Vallee, FR
77183 Marne La Vallee, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terria P. Jenkins
TERRIA P JENKINS EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY343 STATE STROCHESTER, NY 14650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | X-ray apparatus for medical or dental purposes, Radiological apparatus for medical or dental purposes, X-ray photographs for medical or dental purposes, apparatus and installations for the production of X-rays for medical use namely intro-oral radiography for diagnostic purposes in the field of dental radiology; protection devices against X-rays for medical or dental purposes, Roentgens rays tubes for medical or dental purposes; digitized medical scanning for medical or dental use, X-ray photographs apparatus for veterinary use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |