Drawing for LUSH COCONUT CREME

USPTO serial 75633628

LUSH COCONUT CREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEEGARS, GERALD C.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUSH COCONUT CREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORM D. ST. LANDAU

CHRISTA M COLE CALIFORNIA TAN INC10877 WILSHIRE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003TANNING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, LOTIONS, SUNSCREENS, GELS, OILS, MOUSSES, SPRAYS AND CREAMS; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, RINSES, GELS, CONDITIONERS AND SPRAYS; BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH FOAMS, BATH GELS, BODY GELS, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS AND SCENTED BODY SPRAYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2000ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance