USPTO serial 75633778
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN R SPRINKLE
STEVEN R SPRINKLE GRAY CARY WARE & FRIEDENRICH LLP100 CONGRESS AVE STE 1440AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | educational materials provided in electronic and/or multimedia format that can be accessed either through downloading files over an on-line computer network or through compact disks, floppy disks and electronic data storage media; multimedia software and computer software for providing educational materials that is downloadable over a global computer network or stored on compact disk; electronic publications featuring educational materials in text and multimedia formats that are accessible and downloadable via a global computer network or are stored on compact discs and other electronic data storage media | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |