Drawing for BUSINESS DREAM

USPTO serial 75633796

BUSINESS DREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BUSINESS DREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell Radin

MITCHELL RADIN COWAN, DEBAETS, ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advising in organization and business management, professional business management, professional business consultancy, efficiency experts, business information, business inquiries, business investigations, business appraisals, management assistance for industrial or commercial firms, personal management consultancy; marketing studies, marketing research, economic forecasting, public relations, opinion polling, statistical informationACTIVE—
041Publication of books, brochures, leaflets, letters, CD Roms, and journals; arranging and conducting of educational colloquiums, conferences, congresses, seminars, symposiumsACTIVE—
042Analysis for computer system implantation, recovery of computer data, consultancy in the field of computers, non business professional consultancy, quality control, computer software design; technical project studies, engineering; vocational guidanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance