Drawing for SURGINAV

USPTO serial 75633798

SURGINAV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELTSCH, KEITH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURGINAV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan C. Parks

JONATHAN C PARKS KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART, LLPHENRY W OLIVER BLDG535 SMITHFIELD STPITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR USE IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERY AND SURGICAL PLANNINGACTIVE—
010SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, PROBES, REAMERS, PATIENT POSTIONERS, INSTRUMENT POSTIONERS, BROACHES, OSTEOTOMES, SURGICAL SAW, CLAMPS AND ATTACHMENT DEVICES, NAMELY SCREWS, HANDLES AND COUPLERS; OPTICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER MONITORS, HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYS AND SEMI-TRANSPARENT DISPLAY DEVICES, ALL FOR USE IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERY; IMAGING DEVICES, NAMELY, CT SCANNERS, FLUOROSCOPY DEVICES, MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DEVICES, ULTRASOUND DEVICES AND RADIOGRAPHIC DEVICES ALL FOR USE IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERY; AND TRACKING DEVICES, NAMELY, INFRARED TRACKING DEVICES, INERTIAL TRACKING DEVICES AND MAGNETIC TRACKING ALL FOR USE IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 13, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 3, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 19, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance