Drawing for BOSTON TASTE

USPTO serial 75633920

BOSTON TASTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BOSTON TASTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Otho B. Ross

OTHO B ROSS MUSERLIAN, LUCAS & MERCANTI LLP475 PARK AVE S 15TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029poultryABANDONEDFeb 28, 1999
030SaucesABANDONEDFeb 28, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 25, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 24, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 21, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance