USPTO serial 75634333
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GRAND CAYMAN, KY
NEWBURY BERKSHIRE RG14 1QN, GB
Newbury, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell Zimmerman
MITCHELL ZIMMERMAN FENWICK & W LLP2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY CONSULTATION REGARDING USE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONSULTING REGARDING CONFIGURATION, INSTALLATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS, CONSULTING REGARDING REENGINEERING AND TRANSFORMATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS, NAMELY IMPLEMENTATION OF YEAR 2000 AND EURO CURRENCY PROBLEM SOLUTIONS; CONSULTING REGARDING USE, CONFIGURATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL AREA AND OTHER COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND COMPATIBILITY TESTING SERVICES, NAMELY SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS REVIEW SERVICES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SERVICES AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES; SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE SERVICES; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |